User talk:Multichill

Always busy.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Welcome to my talk page. Use it; don't send me e-mail. I reply to messages left on my talk, on my talk page. If I left a message on your talk page, I will reply there (unless you specify otherwise).

1784 -> 1991Edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Moi Multi, auteursrechtprobleempjes, zie

Groet, Wutsje 00:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Wutsje and IronGargoyle: every once in a while painters get mixed up and my bot ends up uploading contemporary art. Thanks for flagging and deleting these files. Multichill (talk) 17:35, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:De pastorij van Poppel - 368055 - onroerenderfgoed.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:De pastorij van Poppel - 368055 - onroerenderfgoed.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dentonny (talk) 13:48, 22 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Artworks posted on Flickr by the artistEdit

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

What's the procedure for artworks on Flickr that have EXIF and that are posted by accounts that say they're the artist? Do we COM:AGF and not ask for VRT verification or do we require VRT verification. Currently looking at File:Abstract watercolor painting on paper 'No title, gouache no. 6.100', painted in 1996 by Dutch painter Fons Heijnsbroek - free download image of colorful painting art.jpg which required a license reviewer to look at. It is properly licensed per Flickr page. I just wanted to check before I pass the license review for the file. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 25 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Abzeronow: that looks fine to me. I don't think we have any reason to doubt that the Flickr user is the painter. Multichill (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

AkimeEdit

Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Alimentation —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 41.243.17.170 (talk) 10:18, 1 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

? Multichill (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geograph upload gapEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago5 comments2 people in discussion

I've just noticed that there's a gap of about 19,000 pictures in uploads from Geograph Britain and Ireland between 1780732 and 1800000. See this Quarry query. Maybe you could have GeographBot go back and fill it in? --bjh21 (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Bjh21: that's weird? Maybe I started the upload at a too high number? I can probably fill the gap. I'll have a look at it. Multichill (talk) 17:26, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I stumbled across another block of missed pictures, so I've made a different version of the query. This one searches for all blocks of 1000 geograph IDs where fewer than 800 of them are present on Commons (limited to somewhere below where GeographBot is currently working). Looks like there might be a total of about 70,000 missing files. --bjh21 (talk) 13:07, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not sure how to approach this yet. I would rather not upload files that have been previously deleted. Multichill (talk) 14:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I think you should get a duplicate-archive warning if you try to upload a file that's identical to one that's been deleted. And also a was-deleted warning if you use the same name it had before. I presume you already handle the duplicate warning to avoid re-uploading files that are already on Commons. --bjh21 (talk) 16:30, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:AJA 13-di-1-adamantylimidazol-2-ylidene.svgEdit

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:AJA 13-di-1-adamantylimidazol-2-ylidene.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 17:26, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Clryt19tt13ges.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't speak Dutch but are any of the sentences shown in the file copyrightable or are they just facts about the Colruyt Group? (Came across this file while helping with the media needs categorization backlog). Abzeronow (talk) 18:17, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Upload CC-BY 4.0 images of CC0 paintingsEdit

Latest comment: 3 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, a local museum has recently started uploading high-res pictures of paintings in their collection. Most of them are CC0 due to the date of death of the creator. However, the photographs of the pictures themselves are pulished under CC-BY 4.0. I am under the impression that your bot automatically flags the uploaded media as CC0 which, I think, should not be done for the images my this case. Is it possible to use your bot for such images? Thanks! FbrG (talk) 21:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@FbrG: great that they are contributing to Commons! You seem to be mixing up copyright status and the license a bit. Happens all the time because it's quite complicated.

First we have the original work, for example a painting. If the painter died more than 70 years ago it's in the public domain in Germany and if it's published more than 95 years ago it's also public domain in the USA. So that's the combination to look for. So all the painters who died before 1928 are public domain and good to go here on Commons.

Second part is the license. When you take a photograph, you're the copyright holder of that photograph. Taking a photograph of a 2D work of art (like a painting) doesn't add new copyright in the USA, but might in other countries (like Germany) so we add a fallback license to cover that case. This is all described at Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

Let's take Half-length Portrait of a Man in Armor (Q117047976): painting by Wilhelm Trübner as an example. The original painting is in the public domain due to age. I updated the image and added the relevant PD-art tag.

If we take Portrait of J. Giessler (Q117048947): painting by Willy Oeser as another example. The original painting is still in copyright until 2037 because the painter died in 1966.

So that means that the underlying work of File:Bildnis von J. Giessler - Willy Oeser - Augustiner M Freiburg.png is still in copyright so the museum can't license it, because it's not in the public domain and I doubt they did a copyright transfer with the painter or heirs. Multichill (talk) 12:48, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Only https://w.wiki/6TSy are at risk of not being PD-art so that's not too bad. Multichill (talk) 13:49, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Looks like only one unlucky shot. Started Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bildnis von J. Giessler - Willy Oeser - Augustiner M Freiburg.png. Multichill (talk) 18:47, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for your in-depth reply!

Regarding the artwork Portrait of J. Giessler (Q117048947): painting by Willy Oeser, the description on the museum page states that the painting was gifted to the museum by a heir of the portraied person. But i guess this has little to do with transferring the rights to the museum? Maybe its a mistake on their behalf for publishing it under CC-BY 4.0, as all other images where the creator died before 1953 are still copyrighted.

For the other image that shows up in your query, no date of death can be found for the creator Hermann Eder (Q95274189): . However, given his date of birth and life expectancy at the time i would say it is reasonable to assume that he died before 1953. FbrG (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Renaming a fileEdit

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

User talk:GO69#Renaming_a_file. Don't spread discussions around. Multichill (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Adding descriptions to files BotMultichill uploadedEdit

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Multichill. A file, File:Anonymous - Landscape - 1985.111 - Cleveland Museum of Art.tiff, was brought to my attention at the Help Desk as lacking a description, even though the API your bot likely used (https://github.com/ClevelandMuseumArt/openaccess) has a description. I added the description manually, but is there a way to do this in bulk you're aware of? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:19, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: catching up (I thought I replied to you already). The whole workflow described at d:Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Automated image uploads is focused on having all the data on Wikidata. In this context I don't care that much about the description. If people want to read the description from the museum, they can click the link and read it at the museum website. We shouldn't just be copying everything over. If you look at current uploads, you'll notice it's even less wikitext. Next step is probably the copyright and license information in structured data to get to this point.

I'm still adding categories because that's still the way to find images and search based on SDC is still not very good. Multichill (talk) 12:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo stuck in category until when?Edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

When can File:Taiwan district boundary sign comparison.jpg finally leave Category:Pages with local camera coordinates and missing SDC coordinates? I have removed all the conflicts. Thanks. Jidanni (talk) 06:30, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jidanni: given the number of files in Category:Pages with local camera coordinates and missing SDC coordinates, I guess one of the bots is not running properly.

Manually it does work. I need to look into this to figure out what's wrong. Multichill (talk) 12:02, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Interieur, een van de glazen panelen waarin het leven van Comenius is geëtst (ontwerp- Jaroslav Benda) - Naarden - 20527961 - RCE.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Interieur, band met glazen panelen en enkele bezoekers - Naarden - 20527958 - RCE.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 08:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality image based on template instead of membership of Category:Quality imagesEdit

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hi! i have a suggestion. your bot should edit based on {{QualityImage}} rather than the category, so as to pre-empt https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=737496782 , because i have seen users adding the cat manually in the past. RZuo (talk) 06:22, 3 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@RZuo: I think it was discussed, but not actually implemented like that. See https://github.com/multichill/toollabs/blob/master/bot/commons/quality_image_add.py

It's probably because of the template soup like for example on File:Loewe frontal.JPG. It is a quality image, but doesn't have the template, instead it uses {{Assessments}}

The statement should probably be removed from these files. A bot removed the template, but statement is still on the files. Multichill (talk) 11:58, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam‎Edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

What exactly is your issue with Category:Stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam‎ being in Category:Stereo cards by source? Like I said, it's a distinction without a purpose. You can go up more level to Category:Stereo images by source and there's plenty of categories in that one are exactly the same kind of categories. For instance Category:Stereo images in Boston Public Library. So what's the difference and why does it matter? Adamant1 (talk) 09:03, 15 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Adamant1: See Commons:Categories#Major_categories. Category:Stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum Amsterdam‎ is the topical category for stereo cards that are in the collection of the Rijksmuseum. So where they are.

Category:Stereo cards by source is in the Category:Media by source tree for who provided the files. That's a different angle. Not all images of stereo cards in the Rijksmuseum are provided by the Rijksmuseum.

I would create a category tree for the collection holder similar to Category:Collections of photographs by museum to group the different collections together. Multichill (talk) 11:42, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll have to think about that. I'd appreciate it if you left the category alone until then. Or you can do it yourself, but repeatedly shuffling categories around for no reason isn't really helpful. Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:53, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Creator QIDs for SDCEdit

Latest comment: 3 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, thanks for configuring BotMultichillT to add structured data to the files I've uploaded. Would it be possible to configure the bot to tag files I've created with creator (P170) Minh Nguyễn (Q69873076) instead of creator (P170) somevalue / Wikimedia username (P4174) Mxn, perhaps based on the presence of Minh Nguyễn (Q69873076) Wikimedia username (P4174) Mxn on Wikidata? Broadly speaking, when there's a Wikidata item about the creator, it would be more stable than a Wikimedia user name that could potentially change. Thanks! Minh Nguyễn ^💬 00:36, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I don't do vanity items and it also raises privacy concerns. So (still) not doing this. Multichill (talk) 11:30, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:California_Historical_Landmarks_in_Stanislaus_County,_CaliforniaEdit

Latest comment: 3 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion

California Historical Landmarks in Stanislaus County, California has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

2601:203:380:7C80:D1F6:9214:E37C:9A3D 04:31, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I reverted the edit. Can you block the IP for troll editing and deal with the rest of it? --Adamant1 (talk) 04:35, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It's impossible to communicate with ipv6 users. Closed the request. Looks like first error so I'll just let it be. Multichill (talk) 11:25, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks. That works. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Thaksin poster is cleared from Ratchadamnoen Nok.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Thaksin poster is cleared from Ratchadamnoen Nok.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20111013-OC-UNK-0005 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:20111013-OC-UNK-0005 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20111010-OC-UNK-0004 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:20111010-OC-UNK-0004 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20111004-OC-UNK-0001 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:20111004-OC-UNK-0001 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:20110906-OC-UNK-0002 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:TASC Peaches2 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:TASC Peaches2 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:BFFAIMG 0792 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:BFFAIMG 0792 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 26 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Changing "location" to "location of creation"Edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello,

Your bot changed a lot of data from "location" to "location of creation". This change does meet the point the data. Could you kindly change it back into "located in" (P706). This was the aim of the label "location". Please use your bot to place the intended label.

Greetings Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 10:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

RDF graph

@Hans G. Oberlack: see Commons:Structured data/Modeling/Location how locations are modeled.

The statements in the structured data apply to the photo, not to the object you see in it. In case of File:Schillerstraße 15 GlienickeNordbahn 2020 NE.jpg, the house is located in Glienicke/Nordbahn (Q585248), not the photo. The photo was only created in Glienicke/Nordbahn (Q585248). So no, I won't change it back. Multichill (talk) 10:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks for explaining. But how do I indicate the location of the depicted object? Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 10:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hans G. Oberlack: for everything you see depicts (P180) is used. In this case I see that it's already set to Schillerstraße (Q104507204) so that seems to be covered. Multichill (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Help needed WLKBotEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Multichill! Commons:Bots/Requests/WLKBot is sort of stuck. Can you help have a look and let us know if it looks okay to you or if you have any suggestions? I tried to find out what the suggested changes are at Module talk:I18n/objects/data. Does any of those look strange to you? --MGA73 (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@MGA73: like this? Multichill (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

When you crop one ofEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

When you crop an image uploaded by BotMultichill, the images source information does not copy over to the cropped file. See this file here. Broichmore (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Broichmore: whatever tool you're using appears to be broken. You should get that tool fixed or at least fix it by hand. Multichill (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I’m using the standard ‘’commons’’ work tool. Broichmore (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Giltsbeach (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Denysarms.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Denysarms.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Giltsbeach (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

WappenWiki permissionEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Wappen Wiki is under a CC license. It's on their website. Giltsbeach (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Giltsbeach: I know, the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) which is not an acceptable license here because it doesn't allow commercial usage, see Commons:Copyright_tags#Free_Creative_Commons_licenses. Multichill (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

My bad, I didn't now non-commercial was not allowed. Giltsbeach (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - After the Iran elections (Jun 20th).jpgEdit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - After the Iran elections (Jun 20th).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In lieu of a barnstar...Edit

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Much more useful than certain categories. Or barnstars. Jmabel ! talk 00:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Making GeographBot requests?Edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Hi,

I'm not sure if here's the place to ask - I will comment that Commons:Batch uploading/Geograph doesn't seem to have anywhere on it - but is there a way to request the GeographBot to upload a selection of Geograph images? I've tried to set aside user James T M Towill's Cumbria Easter Rally 2023 photos, even setting aside a Commons category for it, but I've found that uploading those individually and having to manually input all the copyright, date, time and especially location data for each file is going to be an infuriatingly slow process. As you can see on my Flickr2Commons alt, I've done this manually on occasion for one or two other Geograph photos, but I simply don't have the time, nor the geographic knowledge of Cumbria, to do this batch of about ten rally photos.

Seeing as how the GeographBot is a bit stuck in the realm of photos uploaded in 2015 at the minute, it looks likely that the photos probably won't be uploaded for quite a while yet - I'll ask again, is there a way of requesting the bot to upload a specific batch of photos instead of having to go through user input for some of the most recent uploads? Hullian111 (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hullian111: Have you found the "reuse" link under each photo on Geograph? It leads to a page that has a link (labelled "directly upload this picture to Wikimedia Commons" at the bottom that should fill in everything on Special:Upload apart from the categories. If it doesn't work for you, let me know and I can upload the pictures: it should only take a few minutes. --bjh21 (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Whew, that worked and saved me a lot of time! Thanks, will try this from now on, saves me manually filling in a credit line every time. Hullian111 (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Hullian111 and Bjh21: I'm happy to see you found a solution together. Geograph has 7.4M images, we have 4.6M images so about 2.8M more to go. Based on these statistics, the bot uploads about 100.000 a month so about 28 months of uploading left to get to april 2023. So I guess we'll be in sync somewhere in 2025? Multichill (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

British LibraryEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I need some guidance, please, I'm uploading some images, what do I need to do? to ensure your bot does not duplicate my work.

Here's an example. File:Plate 12, The Shah Nujeef.jpg.

Previous discussions were, that including an accession number in the script, was all that was required. Which of these numbers is appropriate for the British Library? Thanks. Broichmore (talk) 10:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Osemozotan.pngEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Osemozotan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Marbletan (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Jean-Talon Blue Line.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Jean-Talon Blue Line.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DS (talk) 22:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Request to import a Geograph image of A75Edit

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello. May I request you to import [1], via your GeographBot? An immediate search shows it hasn't yet imported here. It will be another great addition to Category:Kinmount Straight of A75 road (Scotland), one of Scotland's allegedly haunted locations. Thanks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@JWilz12345: to quote User:bjh21: Have you found the "reuse" link under each photo on Geograph? It leads to a page that has a link (labelled "directly upload this picture to Wikimedia Commons" at the bottom that should fill in everything on Special:Upload apart from the categories. Multichill (talk) 13:30, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

REMOVE IMAGEEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Please, I was wrong with this image. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gabe_Abrahams,_2023.jpg

What should I do to remove it?

--Walking34 (talk) 09:22, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Walking34: it's deleted (Multichill, I hope it's OK that I responded here). - Jmabel ! talk 15:15, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editing recent Geograph photosEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Multichill - I was trying to add details of the bird depicted in File:Beach at Brighton - geograph.org.uk - 2267277.jpg, but when I opened the edit window, all it had was "{{Geograph from structured data}}" (your creation, it seems!) with no infobox, and my addition (see the file's history) didn't end up in the right place. How do I edit it to add this information so it shows in the normal manner in an infobox? Should it be added to Category:Media missing infobox template, too? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Category:Kirklees,_CalderdaleEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kirklees, Calderdale has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Crouch, Swale (talk) 08:49, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Epizykloiden.pngEdit

Latest comment: 1 month ago4 comments2 people in discussion

File:Epizykloiden.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ChristiaanPR (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Translating the file from german to dutch didn't work very well. I propose to delete the current file, so that it is easier to create the file once more, but then in dutch. I have a copy. ChristiaanPR (talk) 16:31, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@ChristiaanPR: you need to make your comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Epizykloiden.png, not here, or the closing admin probably won't see them. Also, if you want to upload an improved version, just do it by uploading a new version over the old one. It looks like you already did so at least once (although, really, to change language in labels you should upload under a new file name: remember that people are allowed to embed files outside of WMF projects, and we have no way to know where else this might be in use; this might not be an "improvement" to some German-language website that is using this). . - Jmabel ! talk 18:41, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

It had maybe something to do with my cache. The image is now right at its place. ChristiaanPR (talk) 18:55, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Motorway Ahead (IRL).pngEdit

Latest comment: 30 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Motorway Ahead (IRL).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

EthanL13 (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Moritz Calisch (1819-1870) - portret Salomon David Cohen - M006732 - Jewish Museum.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 21 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Moritz Calisch (1819-1870) - portret Salomon David Cohen - M006732 - Jewish Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Peli (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Moritz Calisch (1819-1870) - portret Vrouwtje Salomon Cohen - M006733 - Jewish Museum.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 21 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Moritz Calisch (1819-1870) - portret Vrouwtje Salomon Cohen - M006733 - Jewish Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Peli (talk) 20:33, 29 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Erzherzog Ferdinand Karl von Habsburg (1781-1850) im Stephansornat.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 15 days ago2 comments2 people in discussion

hi dear Multichill,

I would like to inform you that the site of the Kunsthistorisches museum has published other historical portraits. are you by any chance managing the bot? because if that were the case I would like to let you know about the site updates, because taking a tour of the site I noticed that there are new portraits that it would be nice to see them uploaded by that bot if it were possible?? :) I notice that as a "defect" in the categories, it only puts the name of the museum with that of the artist, but not that of the portrayed subject... I spent my time inserting the categories of the characters and I must say that it was quite fun to do it :) I find it really interesting Nesinatra (talk) 18:54, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Comment: I would like to inform that Nesinatra is in fact another sockpuppet of LTA A3cb1. I opened a CU request here. 81.41.175.237 22:46, 4 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:UBB 0001 Wegweiser.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 8 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:UBB 0001 Wegweiser.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Lukas Beck (talk) 14:48, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletionEdit

Latest comment: 4 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:UBB 0002.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Lukas Beck (talk) 19:58, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic